We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
A wide-ranging debate over psychiatric care in general and the Psychiatric Care Act of 1978 in particular, has been going on at various levels of Italian society. Laymen have been expressing their views in favour of ‘open’ or ‘closed’ mental hospitals; journalists have been surveying public opinion on the question, and presenting the opinions of different sides; and psychiatrists and politicians have been tirelessly bringing forward arguments about the applicability and feasibility of the new law. Before the 1978 Act, psychiatric care in Italy had been marked by a long period of legislative inertia going back to Act 36 of 1904, which largely reflected the psychiatric legislation of other European countries. Considering the year in which it was passed, the 1904 Act was effective and commendable. It permitted the founding of new psychiatric hospitals and laid down regulations for compulsory admission. This law, however, belonged to the pretherapeutic era of psychiatry and the impact of psychopharmacology quickly made it out of date. The major shortcoming of the 1904 Act was that it lasted too long and almost exclusively provided for the admission of patients without considering how their discharge was to be achieved. Only in 1968 was the 1904 Act partly updated by the addition of article 4, which provided for voluntary admission to psychiatric institutions and for the founding of mental health centres for patients discharged from psychiatric hospitals.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.